Cohen v. State

81 Tex. Crim. 661
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 28, 1917·No. No. 4345·Published

Opinions

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

From a conviction of violating the Sunday law in exhibiting a moving picture show this appeal is prosecuted.

There is no different question in this case from those in No. 4344, Zucarro v. State, from Tarrant County, this day decided, in an opinion by Judge Morrow. In accordance with the statute, and of Ex parte Lingenfelter, 64 Texas Crim. Rep., 30; Ex parte Zucarro, 72 Texas Crim. Rep., 214; Lempke v. State, 76 Texas Crim. Rep., 125; McLoud v. State, 77 Texas Crim. Rep., 365, 180 S. W.. Rep., 117; Spooner v. State, 79 Texas Crim. Rep., 44, 182 S. W. Rep., 1121, and said Zucarro case, this day decided, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cohen v. State, 81 Tex. Crim. 661 (Tex. 1917).

81 Tex. Crim. 661 (Cohen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lempke v. State
171 S.W. 217 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Spooner v. State
182 S.W. 1121 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Ex Parte Zuccaro
162 S.W. 844 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
McLeod v. State
180 S.W. 117 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Ex Parte Lingenfelter
142 S.W. 555 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)