Spooner v. State
This text of 182 S.W. 1121 (Spooner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a conviction for violating the law in operating a picture show on Sunday. The case was tried before the court without a jury on agreed facts. The court assessed the lowest punishment.
The facts are that appellant gave his picture show on both the afternoon and night of Sunday, January 2, 1916. He advertised, in effect, that it was for the benefit of the inmates of the Tuberculosis Sanitarium located at Carlsbad, near San Angelo. Ho tickets were sold nor admission fees demanded. He represented he would donate to the trustees for said inmates all he received over and above his actual expenses, and he placed in a conspicuous place, at the entrance where the shows were given, a large sign in these words: “Free Contribution." “Pay What You, Wish.” “Benefit Carlsbad Sanitarium.” The gross receipts from these two entertainments were $33.30. He took out of this amount his actual expenses for films, electricity, lights, one day’s rent of building and for labor of three hands, total, $14.75, which was his expenses for that day, thus leaving a balance of $18.55, which he turned over for said inmates.
There can be no question but this was a plain and direct violation pf the statute, and his conviction and punishment were proper. In the recent case of McLeod v. State, 77 Texas Crim. Rep., 365, 180 S. W. Rep., 117, the facts were somewhat similar but nothing like as strong as the facts in this case. We see no necessity of again discussing the question.
The judgment is affirmed
Affvrmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 S.W. 1121, 79 Tex. Crim. 44, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spooner-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.