Cohen v. New York City Industrial Development Agency

91 A.D.3d 416, 936 N.Y.2d 148
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 3, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 A.D.3d 416 (Cohen v. New York City Industrial Development Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cohen v. New York City Industrial Development Agency, 91 A.D.3d 416, 936 N.Y.2d 148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Plaintiff, an ironworker employed by Pre-Fab, alleges that as he and a coworker were moving steel beams, he slipped and fell on plastic debris located on a sand surface. The construction project, which was to build an indoor tennis facility, was owned by defendants New York City Industrial Development Agency and USTA National Tennis Center Association, Incorporated. The owners had contracted with J.H. Mack, LLC to be the general contractor, and J.H. Mack had contracted with Pre-Fab to perform the steel erection work at the site and with Giaquinto to perform the masonry work.

Dismissal of J.H. Mack’s claim for contractual indemnification against Pre-Fab was warranted since there is no evidence that Pre-Fab negligently supervised plaintiffs work or otherwise caused or contributed to the accident (see Paltie v Marquise Constr. Corp., 49 AD3d 380 [2008]; see also Pepe v Center for Jewish History, Inc., 59 AD3d 277 [2009]).

[417]*417Moreover, plaintiffs testimony as to the source of the plastic debris on which he allegedly slipped was speculative and insufficient to raise a question as to whether Giaquinto caused or contributed to plaintiffs injuries (see Grullon v City of New York, 297 AD2d 261, 263-264 [2002]). Accordingly, the contractual and common-law indemnification claims against Giaquinto were also properly dismissed (see Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., Inc. v Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc., 21 AD3d 726 [2005]). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Andrias, DeGrasse, Richter and AbdusSalaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 30 Misc 3d 1235(A), 2011 NY Slip Op 50365(11).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Public Adm'r of Queens County v. 124 Ridge LLC
2022 NY Slip Op 01522 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 416, 936 N.Y.2d 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cohen-v-new-york-city-industrial-development-agency-nyappdiv-2012.