Paltie v. Marquise Construction Corp.

49 A.D.3d 380, 852 N.Y.2d 774
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The record evidence establishes that third-party plaintiff [381]*381Marquise Construction Corp. (Marquise), the general contractor on the work site, undertook the responsibility to hire and supervise laborers to clean the work site. Allstar, the electrical subcontractor, had no such duty, and did not create the hazardous debris condition that caused its employee to slip and fall on an internal staircase. Marquise recognized that the subject wall compound droppings and dust left behind by a sheet-rocking subcontractor constituted a safety hazard, and that such conditions were recurring on the premises. Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the contractual indemnification cause of action was properly granted, where there was no evidence that negligence on the part of Allstar contributed to its employee’s fall (see Arenas v Bon-Ton Dept. Stores, Inc., 35 AD3d 1205, 1207 [2006]). Absent any evidence of negligence on the part of Allstar, there is also no viable common-law indemnification claim. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Paltie v. Marquise Construction Corp., 49 A.D.3d 380, 852 N.Y.2d 774 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 380 (Paltie v. Marquise Construction Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. New York City Industrial Development Agency
91 A.D.3d 416 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)