Coggins v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Coggins v. State

183 S.E.2d 214, 124 Ga. App. 124, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 838

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 23, 1971

Docket46305

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E.2d 214 (Coggins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coggins v. State, 183 S.E.2d 214, 124 Ga. App. 124, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 838 (Ga. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

Whitman, Judge.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for the offense of robbery. He appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence.

The three evidentiary rulings and contended error in the charge to [125]*125the jury which the appellant enumerates as error on this appeal were previously included in the grounds of a motion for new trial, which motion was considered and denied by the trial court on each and every ground therein.

Submitted June 4, 1971 Decided June 23, 1971. Robert D. Peckham, John R. Bennett, L. M. Donovan, Edgar W. Ennis, Jr., for appellant. Thomas W. Ridgway, District Attorney, John T. Strauss, for appellee.

The denial of the motion for new trial was neither appealed from nor enumerated as error. '"Where after trial a motion for new trial is filed and overruled by the trial court such judgment establishes as the law of the case that the questions raised by such motion for new trial are without merit unless such judgment is enumerated as error upon appeal.’ Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (4) (161 SE2d 281).” Gardner v. Gardner, 123 Ga. App. 749 (182 SE2d 318); Ford v. State, 123 Ga. App. 828; Campbell v. State, 123 Ga. App. 116 (179 SE2d 552), and cits.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt, J., concurs. Hall, P. J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitman, Judge.

The appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for the offense of robbery. He appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence.

The three evidentiary rulings and contended error in the charge to [125]*125the jury which the appellant enumerates as error on this appeal were previously included in the grounds of a motion for new trial, which motion was considered and denied by the trial court on each and every ground therein.

Submitted June 4, 1971 Decided June 23, 1971. Robert D. Peckham, John R. Bennett, L. M. Donovan, Edgar W. Ennis, Jr., for appellant. Thomas W. Ridgway, District Attorney, John T. Strauss, for appellee.

The denial of the motion for new trial was neither appealed from nor enumerated as error. '"Where after trial a motion for new trial is filed and overruled by the trial court such judgment establishes as the law of the case that the questions raised by such motion for new trial are without merit unless such judgment is enumerated as error upon appeal.’ Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263 (4) (161 SE2d 281).” Gardner v. Gardner, 123 Ga. App. 749 (182 SE2d 318); Ford v. State, 123 Ga. App. 828; Campbell v. State, 123 Ga. App. 116 (179 SE2d 552), and cits.

Judgment affirmed.

Eberhardt, J., concurs. Hall, P. J., concurs specially.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E.2d 214, 124 Ga. App. 124, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coggins-v-state-gactapp-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack