Ford v. State
This text of 182 S.E.2d 489 (Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FORD
v.
THE STATE.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
William Holley, for appellant.
Ben F. Smith, District Attorney, George W. Darden, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant after his conviction for voluntary manslaughter moved for a new trial on the general grounds and later amended the motion wherein he added three other grounds. The amended motion was overruled. Defendant appealed to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence. The defendant has not enumerated as error the overruling of the amended motion for new trial. The enumerated errors are the same grounds contained in the amended motion. The enumerated errors are without merit because the denial of the amended motion for new trial, unappealed, fixed as the law of the case all issues embraced in the motion. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263, 268 (161 SE2d 281); Bryan v. State, 224 Ga. 389, 390 (162 SE2d 349); Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137).
Judgment affirmed. Bell, C. J., Pannell and Deen, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
182 S.E.2d 489, 123 Ga. App. 828, 1971 Ga. App. LEXIS 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-v-state-gactapp-1971.