Campbell v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Campbell v. State

179 S.E.2d 552, 123 Ga. App. 116, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 743

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 6, 1970

Docket45615

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 179 S.E.2d 552 (Campbell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Campbell v. State, 179 S.E.2d 552, 123 Ga. App. 116, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 743 (Ga. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant, after his conviction, filed a motion for new trial on the general grounds and six special grounds. The motion for new trial was overruled. He appeals to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence. There is no enumeration of error on the overruling of the motion for new trial. The enumerated errors are the six special grounds embraced in the motion for new trial. These grounds are without merit because the denial of the motion for new trial, unappealed, fixed as the law of the case all issues embraced in the motion. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263, 268 (161 SE2d 281); Bryan v. State, 224 Ga. 389, 390 (162 SE2d 349); Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Chief Judge.

The defendant, after his conviction, filed a motion for new trial on the general grounds and six special grounds. The motion for new trial was overruled. He appeals to this court from the judgment of conviction and sentence. There is no enumeration of error on the overruling of the motion for new trial. The enumerated errors are the six special grounds embraced in the motion for new trial. These grounds are without merit because the denial of the motion for new trial, unappealed, fixed as the law of the case all issues embraced in the motion. Hill v. Willis, 224 Ga. 263, 268 (161 SE2d 281); Bryan v. State, 224 Ga. 389, 390 (162 SE2d 349); Tiller v. State, 224 Ga. 645 (164 SE2d 137).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Whitman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E.2d 552, 123 Ga. App. 116, 1970 Ga. App. LEXIS 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-state-gactapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack