Coe v. Ziegler

817 F.2d 29, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 1987
Docket87-3035
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 817 F.2d 29 (Coe v. Ziegler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321 (6th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

817 F.2d 29

Christopher COE, by his next friend Michael COE; Danny &
Sondra Smith, by their next friend Mary Smith,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Linda ZIEGLER; Officer Robert Connelly, Officer Jeffrey R.
Hunt, Police Officers--Cincinnati Police Department; John
P. O'Connor, individually and in capacity as Judge, Hamilton
Co. Juvenile Court, Defendants-Appellees,
Kathleen Byrne, et al., Defendants.

No. 87-3035.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1987.
Decided April 24, 1987.

John H. Metz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Coe.

Frank J. Wasserman, Legal Aid Society, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Smith.

Michael E. Maundrell, Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Hugh O. Frost, II, Asst. City Solicitor, Cincinnati, Ohio, Richard A. Castellini, City Solicitor, for Connelly & Hunt.

Before KEITH, KENNEDY and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Plaintiffs appeal an order of the district court granting absolute or qualified immunity to four of the five Defendants in this civil action for damages and declaratory relief. The Defendants now move to dismiss the appeal on grounds that an order granting immunity is not a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The Plaintiffs have filed a response.

The United States Supreme Court has recently held that the denial of a motion to dismiss based on a claim of qualified or absolute immunity is an appealable final decision. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982). In so holding, the Court reasoned that a party entitled to immunity has the right to be free from the burden of going to trial. Because the Mitchell rationale does not apply when immunity has been granted this order lacks finality. The policy against piecemeal appeals is applicable, and therefore,

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alex LeFever v. James Ferguson
567 F. App'x 426 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Callahan v. Alexander
810 F. Supp. 884 (E.D. Michigan, 1993)
Branson v. City of Los Angeles
912 F.2d 334 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
817 F.2d 29, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coe-v-ziegler-ca6-1987.