Clem v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Clem v. State

68 S.W.3d 289, 347 Ark. 437, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 21

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJanuary 17, 2002

DocketCR 01-1436

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 S.W.3d 289 (Clem v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Clem v. State, 68 S.W.3d 289, 347 Ark. 437, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 21 (Ark. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

P lER CURIAM.

Appellant Joe Edwin Clem, by and through his attorneys, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorneys, Jon A. Williams and Val Price, state in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on their part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

P lER CURIAM.

Appellant Joe Edwin Clem, by and through his attorneys, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorneys, Jon A. Williams and Val Price, state in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on their part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 S.W.3d 289, 347 Ark. 437, 2002 Ark. LEXIS 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clem-v-state-ark-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack