Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse

423 U.S. 882, 96 S. Ct. 145
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 6, 1975
DocketNo. 74-1384; No. 75-17
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 423 U.S. 882 (Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse, 423 U.S. 882, 96 S. Ct. 145 (1975).

Opinion

Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Motion of American Newspaper Publishers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan would grant certiorari.

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari in [883]*883No. 74^1384 and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below. - W. Va. -, 211 S. E. 2d 674.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adams v. Frontier Broadcasting Company
555 P.2d 556 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1976)
Clay Communications, Inc. v. James M. Sprouse
423 U.S. 882 (Supreme Court, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 U.S. 882, 96 S. Ct. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-communications-inc-v-sprouse-scotus-1975.