Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse

423 U.S. 882, 96 S. Ct. 145
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 6, 1975·No. No. 74-1384; No. 75-17·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. Motion of American Newspaper Publishers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Brennan would grant certiorari.

Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari in [883]*883No. 74^1384 and summarily reverse the judgment. Reported below. - W. Va. -, 211 S. E. 2d 674.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse, 423 U.S. 882, 96 S. Ct. 145 (1975).

423 U.S. 882 (Clay Communications, Inc. v. Sprouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Frontier Broadcasting Company
555 P.2d 556 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1976)
Clay Communications, Inc. v. James M. Sprouse
423 U.S. 882 (Supreme Court, 1975)