Clay Communications, Inc. v. James M. Sprouse
This text of 423 U.S. 882 (Clay Communications, Inc. v. James M. Sprouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
96 S.Ct. 145
46 L.Ed.2d 107
CLAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
v.
James M. SPROUSE.
No. 74-1384.
James M. SPROUSE
v.
CLAY COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
No. 75-17.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 6, 1975
Rehearing Denied Nov. 17, 1975.
See 423 U.S. 991, 96 S.Ct. 406.
Appeals of West Virginia.
The motion of American Newspaper Publishers Association for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, is granted. The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. Mr. Justice BRENNAN would grant certiorari.
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS, being of the view, stated in his previous opinions1 and those of Mr. Justice Black,2 that any state or federal libel law imposing liability for discussion of public affairs abridges freedom of speech and of the press contrary to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, would grant certiorari in No. 74-1384 and summarily reverse.
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 355-360, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 401-402, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456 (1967); Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 88-91, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966).
Time, Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 398-401, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456 (1967); Rosenblatt v. Baer, 383 U.S. 75, 94-95, 86 S.Ct. 669, 15 L.Ed.2d 597 (1966); New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 293-297, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 U.S. 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clay-communications-inc-v-james-m-sprouse-scotus-1975.