Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority
Opinion
GABRIELLE CLARK and WILLIAM Case No.: 2:20-cv-02324-APG-VCF CLARK 4 Order Granting Motion to Seal Plaintiffs 5 [ECF No. 94] v. 6 STATE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL 7 AUTHORITY, et al., 8 Defendants 9 The defendants move to seal an exhibit they filed in support of their notice of intervening development. ECF No. 94. The exhibit is filed under seal as ECF No. 95. It contains confidential and sensitive personal information about plaintiff William Clark, who is a student. 12] The defendants’ request to seal this information satisfies the factors set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). 14 I THEREFORE GRANT the defendants’ motion to seal (ECF No. 94). The documents filed at court docket number 95 shall remain sealed. 16 DATED this 12th day of April, 2021. 17 18 ANDREW P. GORDON 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority (Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.