Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority

Opinion

1 2 3 6 GABRIELLE CLARK, et al., 7 Case No.: 2:20-cv-02324-APG-VCF Plaintiff(s), 8 Order v. 9 STATE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORITY, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 This case was set for a continued settlement conference to take place at 10:30 a.m. on 13}) March 17, 2021. Docket No. 72. Plaintiffs did not appear for the settlement conference, apparently 14] on the advice of attorney Jonathan O’Brien. Attorneys must comply with the Court’s orders. Chapman v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co., 613 F.2d 193, 197 (9th Cir. 1979). The method for seeking relief 16] from an order is to file a proper request for that relief on the docket. See, e.g., Local Rule 7-2(a). 17} The Court hereby CAUTIONS Mr. O’Brien that he must strictly comply with all orders moving 18] forward unless a proper request is filed on the docket and is granted by the Court. 19 The settlement conference has now ended. The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to 20] remove the undersigned from the docket as the settlement judge. 22 Dated: March 17, 2021

Nancy J. Koppe 24 United Statés Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 ' A separate order to show cause will not issue on this matter.