Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority

D. Nevada

Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided February 9, 2021·No. 2:20-cv-02324·Unknown

Opinion

GABRIELLE CLARK and WILLIAM Case No.: 2:20-cv-02324-APG-VCF CLARK 4 Order Granting Motion to Seal Plaintiffs 5 [ECF No. 48] STATE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORITY, et al., 8 Defendants 9 The defendants move to seal portions of their response to the pending motion for 10} injunctive relief, the declaration of Adam Johnson in support of the response, and an exhibit to 11} that declaration. ECF No. 48. Each of those documents contains confidential and sensitive 12}) personal information about a student. The defendants filed the entire response, declaration, and exhibits under seal at ECF Nos. 49 and 51. They also filed unsealed versions of those documents, redacting the confidential information, at ECF Nos. 44, 45, and 46. The defendants’ 15} request to seal this information satisfies the factors set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). 17 I THEREFORE GRANT the defendants’ motion to seal (ECF No. 48). The documents filed at court docket numbers 49 and 51 shall remain sealed. 19 DATED this 9th day of February, 2021. 20 21 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GABRIELLE CLARK and WILLIAM Case No.: 2:20-cv-02324-APG-VCF CLARK 4 Order Granting Motion to Seal Plaintiffs 5 [ECF No. 48] STATE PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL AUTHORITY, et al., 8 Defendants 9 The defendants move to seal portions of their response to the pending motion for 10} injunctive relief, the declaration of Adam Johnson in support of the response, and an exhibit to 11} that declaration. ECF No. 48. Each of those documents contains confidential and sensitive 12}) personal information about a student. The defendants filed the entire response, declaration, and exhibits under seal at ECF Nos. 49 and 51. They also filed unsealed versions of those documents, redacting the confidential information, at ECF Nos. 44, 45, and 46. The defendants’ 15} request to seal this information satisfies the factors set forth in Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). 17 I THEREFORE GRANT the defendants’ motion to seal (ECF No. 48). The documents filed at court docket numbers 49 and 51 shall remain sealed. 19 DATED this 9th day of February, 2021. 20 21 ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority, (D. Nev. 2021).

Pincite

Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority (Clark v. State Public Charter School Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related