Clark v. State

229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2007 WL 1341419
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 9, 2007
DocketWD 66175
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 S.W.3d 133 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. State, 229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2007 WL 1341419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jerome Clark appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.

AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. Jovanovic
229 S.W.3d 133 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2007 WL 1341419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-moctapp-2007.