Clark v. State
229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2007 WL 1341419
Opinion
ORDER
Jerome Clark appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the motion court’s judgment. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would have no precedential value.
AFFIRMED. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 696, 2007 WL 1341419 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
229 S.W.3d 133 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carroll v. Jovanovic
229 S.W.3d 133 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)