Carroll v. Jovanovic

229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 718, 2007 WL 1345829

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Progressive Classic Insurance Company (Progressive) appeals from the judgment in favor of Vicky A. Carroll (Carroll) entered by the trial court upon the granting of Carroll’s motion for summary judgment on Carroll’s contract claim based on uninsured motorist coverage provided by Progressive.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on ap peal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).