Carroll v. Jovanovic

Missouri Court of Appeals

Carroll v. Jovanovic

229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 718, 2007 WL 1345829

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 9, 2007

DocketED 88350

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 229 S.W.3d 133 (Carroll v. Jovanovic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carroll v. Jovanovic, 229 S.W.3d 133, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 718, 2007 WL 1345829 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Progressive Classic Insurance Company (Progressive) appeals from the judgment in favor of Vicky A. Carroll (Carroll) entered by the trial court upon the granting of Carroll’s motion for summary judgment on Carroll’s contract claim based on uninsured motorist coverage provided by Progressive.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on ap *134 peal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. Upon de novo review, we find no genuine issue of material fact or error of law. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI