Clark v. State
281 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 657, 2009 WL 1181482
Opinion
ORDER
Maurice Clark appeals the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Clark argues that his plea counsel was ineffective in that the information upon which he was charged was insufficient, and that the plea court failed to establish a factual basis for his guilty plea. Because Clark has established no right to an evidentiary hearing and because none of his claims warrant relief, the motion court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Clark v. State, 281 S.W.3d 929, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 657, 2009 WL 1181482 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
281 S.W.3d 929 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
BERGANTINE v. State
281 S.W.3d 929 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)