Clark v. State

275 So. 2d 571, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7080
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1973
DocketNo. 72-726
StatusPublished

This text of 275 So. 2d 571 (Clark v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. State, 275 So. 2d 571, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7080 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

These appellants were tried jointly and found guilty of robbery by a jury. They were each sentenced to a term of twenty years in the State Penitentiary.

[572]*572lt is their contention on appeal that the trial court erred in denying their motions for a mistrial and a severance.

We have carefully considered appellants’ points in the light of the record on appeal and briefs and have concluded that they are without merit and that no reversible error has been made to appear. Kelly v. State, Fla.App.1967, 202 So.2d 901; Reis v. State, Fla.App.1971, 248 So.2d 666; Woodside v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 426; Washington v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 210 So.2d 290.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reis v. State
248 So. 2d 666 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Woodside v. State
206 So. 2d 426 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Kelly v. State
202 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Washington v. State
210 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 So. 2d 571, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7080, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-state-fladistctapp-1973.