Clark v. State

266 So. 2d 687, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6342
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 26, 1972·No. No. R-3·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and JOHNSON, J., concur. RAWLS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark v. State, 266 So. 2d 687, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6342 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

266 So. 2d 687 (Clark v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holliday v. State
389 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Cotita v. State
381 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Thomasson v. State
277 So. 2d 299 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Nathey v. State
275 So. 2d 589 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
State v. Washington
272 So. 2d 355 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)