Clark v. Lee

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 15, 2003
DocketI.C. NO. 122053
StatusPublished

This text of Clark v. Lee (Clark v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Clark v. Lee, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2003).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission adopts with minor modifications the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law, the following, which were entered into by the parties in a Pre-Trial Agreement dated 18 October 2001 and at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS
1. All parties are properly before the Industrial Commission and the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this claim.

2. All parties have been correctly designated and there is no question as to the misjoinder or non-joinder of parties.

3. An employer-employee relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant Alex Lee, Inc./Lowes Food Stores beginning on 20 July 2000 and continuing until 14 November 2000, the alleged date of injury. Plaintiff was out of work until 24 February 2001, at which time she returned to work for defendant-employer. Plaintiff went back out of work for four days beginning on 14 March 2001, then returned to work and continues to be employed by defendant-employer until the present time.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage was $540.00 per week, yielding a weekly compensation rate of $360.02.

5. Defendant is a duly qualified self-insured employer and Kemper Insurance Companies is a third party administrator employed by defendant to service this claim.

6. All completed Industrial Commission Forms in I.C. File No. 122053, Plaintiff's Answers to Defendants' Interrogatories, and page 9 of Hobart Service Call records for Lowe's Store 192, confirming a completed service call made on 21 September 2001, to repair an oven, may be received into evidence and become part of the record.

7. Plaintiff fell while at work on 14 November 2000, and sustained multiple fractures to her knee. She had surgery and was unable to work and earn wages from 14 November 2000, until 24 February 2001, at which time she returned to her job with defendant. She had follow-up surgery on 14 March 2001, as a result of which she was temporarily disabled and unable to earn wages for approximately four days thereafter, after which she returned to work.

8. In lieu of the testimony of Mr. Robert Sages, the parties stipulate that were he to testify under oath, he would corroborate the testimony of Ms. Annette Hill, an employee of defendant, who testified on behalf of defendant at the hearing.

9. In lieu of the testimony of Paul O. Shricker, M.D., the parties stipulate that were he to testify under oath, he would express his expert opinions that:

a. Plaintiff's fall on 14 November 2001 caused multiple comminuted fractures of her right knee cap as described in the stipulated medical records;

b. Plaintiff's injury required all the medical treatment she has received to date as reflected in stipulated medical records, including surgical procedures on 16 November 2000 and 14 March 2001, in order to effect a cure or provide relief from her symptoms;

c. The injury and treatment provided were sufficiently severe to prevent plaintiff from engaging in any employment during the stipulated dates of her absences from work;

d. Plaintiff remains under his care, and she may require medical monitoring and treatment in the future;

e. Permanent work restrictions and/or a permanent partial impairment rating of plaintiff's right leg will abide completion of her active treatment and Dr. Shricker's determination that she has achieved maximum improvement and restoration of function.

10. Documents stipulated into evidence include the following:

Stipulated Exhibit #1: All medical records and bills for treatment identified in paragraph No. 10 of the Pre-Trial Agreement.

11. At the hearing before the Full Commission, the parties stipulated to the medical records of plaintiff's new treating physician, Dr. G. Hadley Callaway, an orthopedic surgeon. The records have been received into evidence in this case.

***********
Based upon the Stipulations and other competent evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At approximately 6:45 a.m. on 14 November 2000, plaintiff was at work in her job as bakery manager for defendant. She was baking muffins in one of defendant's 6-foot tall commercial ovens. When the muffins were done, plaintiff opened the oven door and attempted to pull out the large rack which contained 10 or 12 trays of freshly baked muffins. The rack is a large rectangular frame that is extremely hot after baking. Plaintiff was wearing heavy kitchen mittens when she grasped the hot oven rack. The rack in the oven plaintiff was using had a history of not sliding out properly.

2. On this occasion, plaintiff had to shake or wobble the hot rack in order to get it loose and pull it out of the oven. After pulling on the rack, plaintiff turned to the right, lost her balance and fell hard to the floor onto her right knee. She could not get up and called for help. Plaintiff's co-workers came and tried to help her up. Her leg swelled up so fast that she could not pull her pants leg up to look at her knee. She felt extreme pain immediately. She was taken to Raleigh Community Hospital emergency room by ambulance.

3. The 14 November 2000 fall experienced by plaintiff was an unexpected and unforeseen event which interrupted her normal work routine.

4. Plaintiff has had no prior knee injuries, pre-existing weakness or medical condition affecting her legs, which were strong before the 14 November 2000, injury.

5. As a proximate result of plaintiff's fall, her knee was broken in three places. She was referred to and treated by orthopaedic surgeon, Paul O. Shricker, M.D., who performed surgery on her knee on 16 November 2000. Dr. Shricker performed a second operation on plaintiff's knee on 14 March 2001. She has remained under Dr. Shricker's care up to the date of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner.

6. The medical care and treatment plaintiff has received for her injury was reasonably necessary in order to effect a cure and provide relief from her symptoms.

7. As a result of her work-related injury, plaintiff was physically unable to work and earn wages from 14 November 2000, until 24 February 2001, at which time she returned to her job with defendant. She had follow-up surgery on 14 March 2001 to remove pins which had been placed in her knee during the initial operation, and as a result was unable to earn wages for approximately four days, after which she returned to work.

8. Dr. Shricker did not find plaintiff at maximum medical improvement, nor did he assign a permanent partial disability rating.

9. Subsequent to the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, plaintiff changed her treating physician from Dr. Shricker to Dr. G. Hadley Callaway, an orthopaedic surgeon with Raleigh Orthopaedic Clinic. Plaintiff presented to Dr. Callaway on 22 October 2002 for further evaluation to determine whether anything else could be done to increase her degree of flexibility in her knee. Dr. Callaway recommended further surgery to remove the remaining hardware in her knee. The surgery was done on 31 October 2002 and was successful. Following the surgery, plaintiff began physical therapy.

10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allred v. Allred-Gardner, Incorporated
117 S.E.2d 476 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1960)
Taylor v. Twin City Club
132 S.E.2d 865 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Troutman v. White & Simpson, Inc.
464 S.E.2d 481 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1995)
Hollar v. Montclair Furniture Co., Inc.
269 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Mills v. City of New Bern
468 S.E.2d 587 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)
Evans v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
418 S.E.2d 503 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1992)
Church v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc.
409 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Rewis v. . Insurance Co.
38 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1946)
Robbins v. Bossong Hosiery Mills, Inc.
17 S.E.2d 20 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1941)
Tharp v. Southern Gables, Inc.
481 S.E.2d 339 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1997)
Cole v. Triangle Brick
524 S.E.2d 79 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Clark v. Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/clark-v-lee-ncworkcompcom-2003.