Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

787 F.2d 674, 252 U.S. App. D.C. 118, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31259
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 16, 1986·No. No. 83-2231·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The suggestions for rehearing en banc have been circulated to the full Court. A vote was requested and a majority of the judges in regular active service have voted in favor of the suggestions. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestions for rehearing en banc are granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the opinion and judgment of October 22, 1985, 775 F.2d 366, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order of the Court will govern further proceedings in this case.

MIKVA Circuit Judge, would deny the suggestions. WALD and SILBERMAN Circuit Judges, did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 787 F.2d 674, 252 U.S. App. D.C. 118, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31259 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

787 F.2d 674 (Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Steele v. United States
District of Columbia, 2024
Davenport v. Djourabchi
316 F. Supp. 3d 58 (D.C. Circuit, 2018)
Seneca Nation of Indians v. State of NY
26 F. Supp. 2d 555 (W.D. New York, 1998)
Now v. Operation Rescue
747 F. Supp. 760 (District of Columbia, 1990)