Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

788 F.2d 762, 252 U.S. App. D.C. 137, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 798 F.2d 499
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 16, 1986·No. No. 83-2111, 83-01842·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full Court. A vote was requested and a majority of the judges in regular active service have voted in favor thereof. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is granted, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, on its own motion, that the opinion and judgment of October 22,1985, 775 F.2d 359, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order of the Court will govern further proceedings in this case.

WALD, C.J., did not participate in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 788 F.2d 762, 252 U.S. App. D.C. 137, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31258 (D.C. Cir. 1986).

788 F.2d 762 (Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related