Claremont v. Rand

79 A. 689, 76 N.H. 116, 1911 N.H. LEXIS 165
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedApril 4, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 79 A. 689 (Claremont v. Rand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Claremont v. Rand, 79 A. 689, 76 N.H. 116, 1911 N.H. LEXIS 165 (N.H. 1911).

Opinion

Peaslee, J.

The reformation prayed for is not needed. While it is true that the fact the guaranteed rental is an annual one is not stated in terms, yet it is manifestly so intended, and such is the legal interpretation of the language used. Kendall v. Green, 67 N. H. 557.

No ground is shown upon which the bill can be maintained as a more convenient remedy than a suit in assumpsit against the signers of the agreement. In such a suit the plaintiff will be entitled to a judgment and execution against each defendant for the whole amount due. It is not apparent wherein equity could give a remedy more ample or more efficient. Davison v. Davison, 71 N. H. 180.

Whether the plaintiff should be permitted to amend by making this proceeding a suit in assumpsit is a matter for the consideration of the superior court.

Case discharged.

Ali concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Phinney v. Levine
381 A.2d 735 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1977)
Wilson v. McCarroll
120 A. 86 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1923)
Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance
118 A. 815 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1922)
Foss v. Place
97 A. 746 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A. 689, 76 N.H. 116, 1911 N.H. LEXIS 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/claremont-v-rand-nh-1911.