Foss v. Place

97 A. 746, 78 N.H. 147, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 19
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided April 4, 1916·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Walker, J.

So far as appears from the case the plaintiff is not entitled to relief in equity. If the defendants had no authority to purchase the automobile for the use of the police department of Dover or to pledge the credit of the city to pay for it, the plaintiff as the mayor of the city and as its representative has the power *148 under the city ordinances to refuse to draw his warrant for the payment for the machine. His injunctive power is adequate to prevent the application of the public funds to this purpose, until the right of the defendants to reimbursement is established by appropriate proceedings at law. No irreparable injury will result. Perkins v. Foye, 60 N. H. 496; Williams v. Mathewson, 73 N. H. 244; Claremont v. Rand, 76 N. H. 116. Under these circumstances it is not advisable to consider at this time the question argued by counsel. No reason appears why the bill should not be dismissed.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foss v. Place, 97 A. 746, 78 N.H. 147, 1916 N.H. LEXIS 19 (N.H. 1916).

97 A. 746 (Foss v. Place) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance
118 A. 815 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1922)
McShane v. Dover
117 A. 526 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1922)