Davison v. Davison
51 A. 905, 71 N.H. 180
Opinion
As the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law ( Walker v. Walker, 63 N. H. 321; Bassett v. Brown, 61 N. H. 602; Rollins v. Riley, 44 N. H. 9), equity will not afford relief. But by a motion addressed to the superior court she may obviate this defect by filing an appropriate count at law as an amendment of the bill. Walker v. Walker, supra, 326; Until that is done the order must be
Exception sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Davison v. Davison, 51 A. 905, 71 N.H. 180 (N.H. 1901).
51 A. 905 (Davison v. Davison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. McCarroll
120 A. 86 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1923)
Salganik v. United States Fire Insurance
118 A. 815 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1922)
Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Cameron
87 A. 254 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1913)
Claremont v. Rand
79 A. 689 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1911)
Forster v. Flack
121 N.W. 890 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Harvey v. Harvey
59 A. 621 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1904)