City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.

207 U.S. 584, 28 S. Ct. 262, 52 L. Ed. 351, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1251
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 23, 1907·No. No. 88·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Boom Company v. United States, 202 [585]*585U. S. 613; California Consolidated Mining Company v. Manley, 203 U. S. 579. Certiorari denied. Chicago and Northwestern Railway Company v. Osborne, 146 U. S. 354; McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661; Forsythe v. Hammond, 166 U. S. 506.

Mr. John L. Webster and Mr. Carl C. Wright for appellants. Mr. Lucius H. Beers, Mr. Howard Mansfield and Mr. R. S. Hall for appellee. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co., 207 U.S. 584, 28 S. Ct. 262, 52 L. Ed. 351, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1251 (1907).

207 U.S. 584 (City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sioux City Foundry Co. v. City of South Sioux City
968 F.2d 777 (Eighth Circuit, 1992)