California Consolidated Mining Co. v. Manley

Supreme Court

California Consolidated Mining Co. v. Manley

203 U.S. 579, 27 S. Ct. 779, 51 L. Ed. 326, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1631

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 22, 1906·No. No. 148·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskirk, 3 Wall. 448; Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, Mo. (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, [580]*580198 U. S. 173; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541, 544.

Mr. Myron A. Folsom for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Forney for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Green v. Van Buskirk, 3 Wall. 448; Union Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Kirchoff, 160 U. S. 374; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, Mo. (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130; Schlosser v. Hemphill, [580]*580198 U. S. 173; Clark v. Roller, 199 U. S. 541, 544.

Mr. Myron A. Folsom for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. H. Forney for defendants in error.

California Consolidated Mining Co. v. Manley, 203 U.S. 579, 27 S. Ct. 779, 51 L. Ed. 326, 1906 U.S. LEXIS 1631 (1906).

Pincite

203 U.S. 579 (California Consolidated Mining Co. v. Manley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related