City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & Curran
This text of City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & Curran (City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & Curran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOURTH DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., ANDREWS, P. J., AND BOGGS, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
August 30, 2013
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A12A0620. CITY OF BALDWIN v. WOODARD & CURRAN, INC.
ANDREWS, Presiding Judge.
In City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, 316 Ga. App. 768 (730 SE2d 486)
(2012), we affirmed the jury verdict awarding Woodard & Curran $203,000 for work
done on the City of Baldwin’s water treatment system. Our Supreme Court granted
certiorari and reversed. See City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, 293 Ga. 19 (743
SE2d 381) (2013). Accordingly, our previous opinion is vacated, the judgment of the
Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, and the judgment of the trial court
is reversed.
Judgment reversed. Doyle, P. J., and Boggs, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
City of Baldwin, Georgia v. Woodard & Curran, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-baldwin-georgia-v-woodard-curran-gactapp-2013.