Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 24, 2001

Docket01-798

StatusPublished

This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to supplement record and relator’s motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record or, in the alternative, motion to strike the motion to supplement the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement record and motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record be, and hereby are, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that relator’s response to motion to supplement record is due within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to supplement record and relator’s motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record or, in the alternative, motion to strike the motion to supplement the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement record and motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record be, and hereby are, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that relator’s response to motion to supplement record is due within ten days of the date of this entry.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-selnick-ohio-2001.