Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick. Read the opinion of the Court — 94 Ohio St. 3d 1
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 2001·No. 01-798·Published

Opinion

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to supplement record and relator’s motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record or, in the alternative, motion to strike the motion to supplement the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement record and motion for leave to file response to motion to supplement record be, and hereby are, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that relator’s response to motion to supplement record is due within ten days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick, 93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Ohio 2001).

93 Ohio St. 3d 1258 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Selnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.