Christy Lescota-Grailer v. Shanon Del Jones

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 12, 2021
DocketA21A1370
StatusPublished

This text of Christy Lescota-Grailer v. Shanon Del Jones (Christy Lescota-Grailer v. Shanon Del Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christy Lescota-Grailer v. Shanon Del Jones, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ April 29, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1370. CHRISTY LESCOTA-GRAILER v. SHANON DEL JONES.

Following their divorce, Christy Lescota-Grailer and Shanon Del Jones frequently litigated issues related to custody and child support.1 Following remand of the most recent appeal, the trial court entered an order on February 5, 2021, finding Lescota-Grailer in contempt for failure to pay child support and attorney fees and awarding Jones attorney fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 (b). Lescota-Grailer then filed this appeal. The trial court’s order, however, is not subject to direct appeal. Appeals from orders in domestic relations cases, including orders holding or declining to hold persons in contempt, must be pursued by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2).2 Similarly, appeals from awards of attorney fees and litigation expenses under OCGA § 9-15-14 must be made by discretionary application, not direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Res., 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996).

1 See Grailer v. Jones, 349 Ga. App. 625 (824 SE2d 118) (2019); Case Nos. A20D0031 (Sept. 5, 2019); A16A0520 (June 8, 2016). 2 Although OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11) permits a direct appeal from child custody rulings issued in child custody cases, the February 5 order does not include any child custody rulings. Accordingly, this appeal does not fall within the scope of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11). See Voyles v. Voyles, 301 Ga. 44, 47 (799 SE2d 160) (2017). Lescota-Grailer’s failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/29/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grailer v. Jones.
824 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Voyles v. Voyles
799 S.E.2d 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christy Lescota-Grailer v. Shanon Del Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-lescota-grailer-v-shanon-del-jones-gactapp-2021.