Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 30, 2016·No. 03-15-00144-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00144-CR

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is

made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State (Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.