Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2016
NO. 03-15-00144-CR
Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE
This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the district court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the
district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of
conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is
made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State (Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.