Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State

DecidedJune 30, 2016

Docket03-15-00144-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State (Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JUNE 30, 2016

NO. 03-15-00144-CR

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the district court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is

made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI