Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00144-CR

Christopher Arthur Kurtz, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. CR2014-343, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER FOR CLERK TO PROVIDE APPELLATE RECORD TO APPELLANT

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the instant appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Appellant’s counsel has certified to the Court that he provided copies of

the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and

file a pro se response, and supplied appellant with a form motion for pro se access to the appellate

record. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant has timely

filed the motion requesting access to the appellate record with this Court.

Appellant’s pro se motion is granted. We hereby direct the clerk of the trial court to

provide a copy of the reporter’s record and clerk’s record to appellant, and to provide written

verification to this Court of the date and manner in which the appellate record was provided, on or

before June 25, 2015. See id. at 321. It is ordered on June 15, 2015.

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Do Not Publish