Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 9, 2015·No. 03-15-00144-CR·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-15-00144-CR 6006483 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/9/2015 4:42:36 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-15-00144-CR

CHRISTOPHER ARTHUR KURTZ § IN THE THIRD FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS vs. § DISTRICT 7/9/2015 COURT OF PM 4:42:36 JEFFREY D. KYLE THE STATE OF TEXAS § APPEALS OF TEXAS Clerk

STATE’S FIRST MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes the State of Texas, Appellee in the above-styled and -numbered

cause, and moves for an extension of time of 30 days to file Appellee’s brief, and

for good cause would show the following:

I.

Appellant was indicted for Aggravated Kidnapping, Evading Arrest with a

Vehicle and two counts of Tampering with Physical Evidence on July 2, 2014. All

four counts were enhanced to habitual status. The jury convicted Appellant of

Aggravated Kidnapping, Evading Arrest with a Vehicle and one of the Tampering

counts. The jury assessed punishment at 70 years confinement for the Aggravated

Kidnapping, 75 years for Evading Arrest, and 30 years for Tampering, to be served

concurrently.

Appellant’s brief was originally due with the Court on or about April 23,

2015. After this Court granted Appellant’s motion for extension, Appellant filed a

brief on June 5, 2015 related to the Aggravated Kidnapping count. Counsel for

1 Appellant subsequently filed an Anders brief related to the Evading Arrest and

Tampering convictions on June 9, 2015. The State’s brief is currently due on July

8, 2015. Appellant’s pro se brief is due on July 24, 2015.

II.

Clayten Hearrell – the attorney for the State at trial – is handling this case on

appeal. Mr. Hearrell was assigned the instant appeal within the past few weeks.

From June 1st to June 8th, Mr. Hearrell had a trial involving Murder, Possession of

a Prohibited Weapon, Delivery of a Controlled Substance in PG 1 Between 1 and 4

Grams, and Delivery of a Controlled Substance in PG 1 < 1 Gram in CR2013-417.

Mr. Hearrell attended a law conference from June 29th to July 3rd, and he

completed a brief in 03-14-00570-CR which was filed on July 3, 2015. Although

Mr. Hearrell has read Appellant’s initial brief and has obtained copies of the

clerk’s and reporter’s records, he has not yet been able to complete the State’s brief

in the instant cause. In light of the foregoing, the State respectfully requests an

extension of 30 days to file its brief. This is the first extension sought by Appellee.

III.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the State’s counsel

respectfully prays for an extension of 30 days, until August 8, 2015, so that an

2 adequate response may be made to Appellant’s brief. This extension is not

requested for purposes of delay but so that justice may be done.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley Assistant District Attorney SBN: 24088254 preslj@co.comal.tx.us 150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307 New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Phone: (830) 221-1300 Fax: (830) 608-2008

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joshua D. Presley, Assistant District Attorney for the State of Texas,

Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this State’s First Motion to

Extend Time to File Brief has been delivered to Appellant CHRISTOPHER

ARUTHER KURTZ’s attorney in this matter:

John G. Jasuta lawyer1@johnjasuta.com 1801 East 51st St. Austin, TX 78723 Attorney for Appellant on Appeal

By electronically sending it to the above-listed email address through

efile.txcourts.gov, this 9th day of July, 2015.

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State (Christopher Arthur Kurtz v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.