Christie v. State
This text of 538 So. 2d 544 (Christie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provisions without [545]*545prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 So. 2d 544, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 471, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 861, 1989 WL 12399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christie-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.