Christie v. State

538 So. 2d 544, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 471, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 861, 1989 WL 12399
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 17, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1412
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 538 So. 2d 544 (Christie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christie v. State, 538 So. 2d 544, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 471, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 861, 1989 WL 12399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provisions without [545]*545prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coupe v. State
564 So. 2d 1199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Hart v. State
543 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 So. 2d 544, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 471, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 861, 1989 WL 12399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christie-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.