Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hart v. State

Hart v. State

543 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2707, 1989 WL 49615
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 12, 1989
DocketNo. 88-556
StatusPublished

This text of 543 So. 2d 357 (Hart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hart v. State, 543 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2707, 1989 WL 49615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

Hart has appealed from a judgment and sentence for attempted burglary of a dwelling. The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Christie v. State, 538 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) citing Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We therefore strike the cost provisions without prejudice to the State to seek [358]*358reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Christie, supra.

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Christie v. State
538 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
543 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2707, 1989 WL 49615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hart-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.