Hart v. State
543 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2707, 1989 WL 49615
Opinion
Hart has appealed from a judgment and sentence for attempted burglary of a dwelling. The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Christie v. State, 538 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) citing Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We therefore strike the cost provisions without prejudice to the State to seek [358] reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Christie, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hart v. State, 543 So. 2d 357, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1173, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2707, 1989 WL 49615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
543 So. 2d 357 (Hart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jenkins v. State
444 So. 2d 947 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
Christie v. State
538 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)