Fanning v. State
537 So. 2d 197, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1989 WL 3275
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 20, 1989
DocketNo. 87-1928
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 537 So. 2d 197 (Fanning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fanning v. State, 537 So. 2d 197, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1989 WL 3275 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
Opinion
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments [198]*198and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Christie v. State
538 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Ayers v. State
538 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
537 So. 2d 197, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 247, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1989 WL 3275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fanning-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.