Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.

230 So. 2d 13

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedOctober 29, 1969

DocketNo. 38493

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 230 So. 2d 13 (Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc., 230 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in' this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in' this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, THORNAL, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 So. 2d 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/charles-w-ackerman-of-florida-inc-v-frank-j-rooney-inc-fla-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack