Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.
230 So. 2d 13
Opinion
The Petition for Writ of Certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in' this Court. We issued the Writ and have heard argument of the parties. After argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Writ was improvidently issued. Therefore, the Writ is hereby discharged and the Petition for Writ of Certiorari dismissed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc., 230 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1969).
230 So. 2d 13 (Charles W. Ackerman of Florida, Inc. v. Frank J. Rooney, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Municipio de Mayagüez v. Lebrón
167 P.R. Dec. 713 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2006)
Municipio De Mayagüez v. Lebrón H/N/C Lebrón & Associates
2006 TSPR 70 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 2006)
Roe v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co.
533 So. 2d 279 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Druhill Constr., Inc. v. Rsh Constructors, Inc.
518 So. 2d 951 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Eugene W. Kelsey v. ARCHIT. OPENINGS
484 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)