Chapman v. Taylor
This text of 1933 OK 292 (Chapman v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s amended petition for contest over an election, to which judgment plaintiff excepted, and in open court gave notice of intention to appeal, and thereafter on the 29th day of February, 1932i, plaintiff in error filed his appeal and on August 29, 1932, briefed the cause. The defendant in error has filed no brief herein and has offered no excuse for his failure to do so.
Upon the authority of State ex rel. Bank Commissioner v. Parrish, 114 Okla. 239, 246 P. 1117, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1933 OK 292, 21 P.2d 1056, 163 Okla. 274, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chapman-v-taylor-okla-1933.