Chapman v. Taylor

1933 OK 292, 21 P.2d 1056, 163 Okla. 274, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 712
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 9, 1933·No. 23390·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A judgment was entered dismissing plaintiff’s amended petition for contest over an election, to which judgment plaintiff excepted, and in open court gave notice of intention to appeal, and thereafter on the 29th day of February, 1932i, plaintiff in error filed his appeal and on August 29, 1932, briefed the cause. The defendant in error has filed no brief herein and has offered no excuse for his failure to do so.

Upon the authority of State ex rel. Bank Commissioner v. Parrish, 114 Okla. 239, 246 P. 1117, this cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chapman v. Taylor, 1933 OK 292, 21 P.2d 1056, 163 Okla. 274, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 712 (Okla. 1933).

1933 OK 292 (Chapman v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tulsa v. Stroud
1938 OK 26 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1938)
Bruner v. Naden
1934 OK 309 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
American Employers' Ins. Co v. Anderson
1934 OK 275 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. Peters
1934 OK 274 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Ed Hockaday & Co. v. Boyles
1934 OK 278 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Manley v. Johnson
32 P.2d 27 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1934)
Cline v. Clark
1933 OK 432 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Willis
1933 OK 439 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)