City of Tulsa v. Stroud

1938 OK 26, 75 P.2d 434, 181 Okla. 525, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 10
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided January 18, 1938·No. No. 27993.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On July 6, 1937, plaintiff in error filed petition in error with case-made attached in this court and on August 27, 1937, the brief was filed by the plaintiff in error.

The defendant in error has failed to file any brief or offer any excuse for such failure. The cause- is, therefore, reversed and remanded, with directions to vacate and set aside the order and judgment heretofore rendered for the plaintiff and to grant a new trial. Chapman v. Taylor, 163 Okla. 274, 21 P. (2d) 1058.

OSBORN, C. J., BAYLESS, V. C. J., and RILEY, WELCH, PHELPS, CORN, GIBSON, and HURST, JJ., concur. DAVI-SON, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Tulsa v. Stroud, 1938 OK 26, 75 P.2d 434, 181 Okla. 525, 1938 Okla. LEXIS 10 (Okla. 1938).

1938 OK 26 (City of Tulsa v. Stroud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hough v. Leonard
867 P.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1993)