Ed Hockaday & Co. v. Boyles

1934 OK 278, 32 P.2d 711, 168 Okla. 243, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 139
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 8, 1934·No. 24322·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was commenced in the district court of Blaine county to recover for the conversion of wheat, and after a trial without a jury the court found the issues in favor of the defendant, and it is from a judgment refusing to find for the plaintiff against the purchaser of the wheat that this appeal is prosecuted. On June 13, 1933, plaintiff in error filed brief, which reasonably supports the allegations of the petition in error. Under the authorities of the opinions of this court many times rendered, it is not the duty of this court to search the record to find some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court. Moore v. Jefferson, 164 Okla. 270, 23 P. (2d) 693; Chapman v. Taylor, 163 Okla. 274, 21 P. (2d) 1058.

The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to grant a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ed Hockaday & Co. v. Boyles, 1934 OK 278, 32 P.2d 711, 168 Okla. 243, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 139 (Okla. 1934).

1934 OK 278 (Ed Hockaday & Co. v. Boyles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Moore v. Jefferson
1933 OK 440 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Chapman v. Taylor
1933 OK 292 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)