Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.

256 A.D. 841, 10 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5102

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 30, 1939

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 A.D. 841 (Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co., 256 A.D. 841, 10 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

On appeals by defendant R. Hoe & Co., Inc., from an order made the 6th day of October, 1938, directing its examination before trial and from an order made the 25th day of November, 1938, denying its motion to vacate the [842]*842examination and discovery and inspection of its records, orders in so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johns ton and Adel, JJ., concur. On appeal by defendant Boudinot Atterbury from order made the 6th day of October, 1938, 'directing his examination before trial and discovery and inspection of various records, order in so far as appealed from affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order directing the examination before trial of defendant Atterbury and a discovery and inspection of various records for the reasons stated in Chance v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York (ante, pp, 840, 841), decided herewith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On appeals by defendant R. Hoe & Co., Inc., from an order made the 6th day of October, 1938, directing its examination before trial and from an order made the 25th day of November, 1938, denying its motion to vacate the [842]*842examination and discovery and inspection of its records, orders in so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johns ton and Adel, JJ., concur. On appeal by defendant Boudinot Atterbury from order made the 6th day of October, 1938, 'directing his examination before trial and discovery and inspection of various records, order in so far as appealed from affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell and Adel, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order directing the examination before trial of defendant Atterbury and a discovery and inspection of various records for the reasons stated in Chance v. Guaranty Trust Company of New York (ante, pp, 840, 841), decided herewith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D. 841, 10 N.Y.S.2d 226, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-v-guaranty-trust-co-nyappdiv-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack