Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.

251 A.D. 855, 297 N.Y.S. 293, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7980
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 251 A.D. 855 (Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co., 251 A.D. 855, 297 N.Y.S. 293, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7980 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

Seven orders included in a consolidated appeal, denying defendants’ motions, under rule 107, subdivision 6, of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the first, third, fourth and sixth causes of action in the complaint, on the ground that they are barred by Statutes of Limitation affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements [856]*856on each order, with leave to answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. Bach cause of action is essentially equitable in its nature. They are based upon claimed breaches of duty by individuals and corporations occupying a fiduciary relationship to the corporation in behalf of which this derivative action is prosecuted. The fact that the incidents upon which they are based might be made the subject of an action at law by the corporation does not preclude the selfsame facts from sustaining an action on a different or equitable theory for appropriate redress. The theory of each of the causes of action being equitable in its nature, the ten-year Statute of Limitation is applicable. (Civ. Prae. Act, § 53.) As to the third cause of action, the statute was tolled for at least the period between April, 1932, and July, 1933; and since the acts upon which it is based were not concluded until June, 1925, that action is not barred by the statute. In so far as Potter v. Walker (252 App. Div. 244) is to the contrary, it may not be followed. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Figge
181 N.W.2d 211 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1970)
Lander v. Gilman
53 Misc. 2d 65 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)
Natale v. Mazzuki
198 Misc. 494 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Rabinowitz v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.
198 Misc. 312 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.
173 Misc. 754 (New York Supreme Court, 1939)
Chance v. Guaranty Trust Co.
256 A.D. 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Bliss v. Omnibus Corp.
169 Misc. 662 (New York Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D. 855, 297 N.Y.S. 293, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chance-v-guaranty-trust-co-nyappdiv-1937.