Chambers v. Terrell

639 S.W.2d 451, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 437, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 326
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 14, 1982
DocketC-1179
StatusPublished
Cited by24 cases

This text of 639 S.W.2d 451 (Chambers v. Terrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chambers v. Terrell, 639 S.W.2d 451, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 437, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 326 (Tex. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought for termination of parental rights and for the adoption of a child of the parents. Only the termination of parental rights is before us.

After signing an affidavit relinquishing possession, the mother, without delay, changed her mind; and she resisted termination. The trial court ordered termination.

The Court of Appeals reversed that judgment and dismissed the petition for termination. A reason assigned was that there was no evidence to support the finding of the trial court that termination was in the best interest of the child. 630 S.W.2d 800.

*452 There is not a point attacking this “no evidence” holding; and we regard that as dispositive of the case.

The holding of the Court of Appeals that there must be “clear and convincing evidence” for a “voluntary” termination was unnecessary. The trial court, sitting without a jury, did not use a lesser standard.

We are not to be understood as approving the holding of the Court of Appeals that the affidavit of relinquishment was void because the attorney who acted as the notary to take the affidavits had a “strong financial and beneficial interest.” Among other things, no financial interest appears in the record. The point is reserved.

The writ of error is refused, no reversible error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

in the Interest of A.R.M.K., a Child
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2019
In re Morris
498 S.W.3d 624 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016)
in Re Barre Morris
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2016
Vallejo v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services
280 S.W.3d 917 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2009)
in the Interest of L.M.I. and J.A.I., Minor Children
119 S.W.3d 707 (Texas Supreme Court, 2003)
Lumbis v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services
65 S.W.3d 844 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2002)
In the Interest of V.R.W.
41 S.W.3d 183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
In Re VRW
41 S.W.3d 183 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Corina Vela v. Marywood
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000
Vela v. Marywood
17 S.W.3d 750 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)
In the Interest of Baby Girl T.
904 S.W.2d 206 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
Richardson v. Oldham
12 F.3d 1373 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
Prince v. First City, Texas—Houston, N.A.
853 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1993)
Richardson v. Oldham
811 F. Supp. 1186 (E.D. Texas, 1992)
Neal v. Texas Department of Human Services
814 S.W.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Coleman v. Smallwood
800 S.W.2d 353 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1990)
Byrne v. Catholic Charities, Diocese of San Angelo, Inc.
710 S.W.2d 780 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 S.W.2d 451, 25 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 437, 1982 Tex. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-terrell-tex-1982.