Chambers v. State

582 So. 2d 170, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7192, 1991 WL 128312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chambers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 530 So. 2d 452
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 16, 1991·No. No. 91-433·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

Appellant, David Chambers, appeals an order placing appellant on probation and requiring the payment of restitution as a condition of probation.

Appellant contends, and the State concedes, that portions of the probation order must be stricken because they impermissi-bly delegate the manner of payment of the restitution to be determined by the probation officer. See Milloway v. State, 567 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Williams v. State, 556 So.2d 799 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand appellant’s sentence with directions that those portions of the probation order which delegate the manner of payment of restitution be stricken.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chambers v. State, 582 So. 2d 170, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7192, 1991 WL 128312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 170 (Chambers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
556 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Milloway v. State
567 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)