Chambers v. State

569 So. 2d 933, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8784, 1990 WL 178634
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2956
StatusPublished

This text of 569 So. 2d 933 (Chambers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chambers v. State, 569 So. 2d 933, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8784, 1990 WL 178634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Chief Judge.

We affirm the trial court’s imposition of a probationary split sentence on the authority of Poore v. State, 531 So.2d 161 (Fla. 1988). As in Glass v. State, 556 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), however, we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court as one of great public importance:

Does a double jeopardy violation result from the imposition of a probationary split sentence when the Legislature has not explicitly authorized that disposition in the sentencing alternatives of section 921.187, Florida Statutes?

AFFIRMED.

SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Glass v. State
556 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Poore v. State
531 So. 2d 161 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
569 So. 2d 933, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8784, 1990 WL 178634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chambers-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.