Milloway v. State

567 So. 2d 1073, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7986, 1990 WL 154860
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1990·No. No. 90-289·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is affirmed with two modifications: (1) the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court in the probation order is hereby corrected so as to conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement at the sentencing hearing below, to wit: $3,294.14, Williams v. State, 525 So.2d 458, 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); A.R. v. State, 475 So.2d 308, 309 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Brown v. State, 423 So.2d 599, 600 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); and (2) the directive in the probation order which delegates to the probation officer the determination of the mode and manner of payment of restitution, fees, and costs by the defendant is stricken, as only the trial court may direct a payment schedule for such restitution, fees, and costs. Williams v. State, 556 So.2d 799, 800 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milloway v. State, 567 So. 2d 1073, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7986, 1990 WL 154860 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

567 So. 2d 1073 (Milloway v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chambers v. State
582 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)