Chalasani v. Neuman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Chalasani v. Neuman

91 A.D.2d 1030, 458 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 24, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 A.D.2d 1030 (Chalasani v. Neuman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chalasani v. Neuman, 91 A.D.2d 1030, 458 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendant from depriving plaintiff of staff membership and privileges at Lydia E. Hall Hospital, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated October 27, 1982, as denied his motion for a preliminary injunction. Appeal dismissed as moot, with $50 costs and disbursements. At oral argument this court was informed that the complaint in this action has been dismissed upon the granting of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7). Since no action is presently pending, the appeal from the order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction is moot. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, inter alia, to enjoin defendant from depriving plaintiff of staff membership and privileges at Lydia E. Hall Hospital, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.), dated October 27, 1982, as denied his motion for a preliminary injunction. Appeal dismissed as moot, with $50 costs and disbursements. At oral argument this court was informed that the complaint in this action has been dismissed upon the granting of defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7). Since no action is presently pending, the appeal from the order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction is moot. Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 A.D.2d 1030, 458 N.Y.S.2d 620, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chalasani-v-neuman-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack