Halberstadt v. Kissane

31 A.D.2d 568, 294 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2915
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 14, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 568 (Halberstadt v. Kissane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Halberstadt v. Kissane, 31 A.D.2d 568, 294 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from judgments of the Supreme Court, Franklin 'County, entered upon a decision of the court at Trial Term, dismissing the first cause of action in appellant’s complaint. Appellant, a physician duly licensed -to practice medicine in the State of New York, seeks to compel her reinstatement to the medical staff at the Alice Hyde Memorial Hospital, a private, nonprofit, voluntary institution. Appellant’s position is that since the hospital has received public assistance under the Hill-Burton Act, is tax exempt and treats welfare patients for which it is paid from public funds, it has no authority to refuse to reappoint her. We cannot agree with this contention. It is well established that the receipt of public funds and tax exemption do not alone transform an otherwise private hospital into a public one in this [569]*569State (e.g., Yam Campen v. Olean Gen. Hosp., 210 App. Div. 204, affd. 239 N. Y. 615) or in certain other jurisdictions (e.g., State ex rel. Sams v. Ohio Val. Gen. Hosp. Assn., 149 W. Ya. 229). Accordingly, the Alice Hyde Memorial Hospital is a private institution and the discretionary refusal to reappoint the appellant under the circumstances here present did not constitute a legal wrong (Leider v. Beth Israel Hosp. Assn., 11 N Y 2d 205; cf. Matter of Alpert V. Board of Governors of City Hosp., 286 App. Div. 542). Judgments affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. [51 Misc 2d 634.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chalasani v. Neuman
97 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Moss v. Albany Medical Center Hospital
61 A.D.2d 545 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Norr v. Spiegler
56 A.D.2d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Fried v. Straussman
41 N.Y. 376 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Baron v. Carson
410 F. Supp. 299 (N.D. Illinois, 1976)
Fried v. Straussman
50 A.D.2d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Fritz v. Huntington Hospital
48 A.D.2d 684 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Fried v. Straussman
82 Misc. 2d 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)
Spencer v. Community Hospital of Evanston
393 F. Supp. 1072 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Doyle v. Unicare Health Serv., Inc., Aurora Center
399 F. Supp. 69 (N.D. Illinois, 1975)
Ascherman v. San Francisco Medical Society
39 Cal. App. 3d 623 (California Court of Appeal, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 568, 294 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/halberstadt-v-kissane-nyappdiv-1968.