Chace v. Vasquez
24 U.S. 429, 6 L. Ed. 511, 11 Wheat. 429, 1826 U.S. LEXIS 326
Opinion
The Court were of opinion, that the case was embraced by the principle decided in the case of the Palmyra, since an appeal would still lie from the damages when ascertained; but, that, had the decree of the Circuit Court dismissed the libel, such decree would have been final.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chace v. Vasquez, 24 U.S. 429, 6 L. Ed. 511, 11 Wheat. 429, 1826 U.S. LEXIS 326 (1826).
24 U.S. 429 (Chace v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
L. Joseph Albright v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Gte Government Systems Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
59 F.3d 1089 (Tenth Circuit, 1995)
ABKCO Music, Inc. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd.
841 F.2d 494 (Second Circuit, 1988)
Ricardo Fotys Caradelis v. Refineria Panama, S. A.
384 F.2d 589 (Fifth Circuit, 1967)
Iordanis Anastasiadis v. S.S. Little John
339 F.2d 538 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Southern Ry. Co.
90 F. 211 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western North Carolina, 1898)
McGourkey v. Toledo & Ohio Central Railway Co.
146 U.S. 536 (Supreme Court, 1892)
McLean v. Clark
23 F. 861 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan, 1885)
Georgia National Bank v. Henderson
46 Ga. 487 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1872)
Kilgore v. Bulkley
14 Conn. 362 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1841)
Canter v. American Insurance
28 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1830)
President of the Bank of Washington v. Triplett
26 U.S. 25 (Supreme Court, 1828)